5. Learned Deputy Prosecutor General as well as counsel for your complainant further argued that during the investigation in the case the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi led on the recovery of sleeping tablets on 14.02.2018. The report of Punjab Forensic Science Agency, Lahore has long been made before the Court wherein the sleeping pills were declared to be comprising “Alprazolam and Procyclidin” whereas “Diazepam” and “Chloroquin” were detected from the liver although not within the belly. That's why, the recovery of claimed sleeping tablets hardly connects the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi with the crime complained of. Learned Deputy Prosecutor General and counsel with the complainant have also argued that during the investigation in the case the petitioner Bhoora led on the recovery of the motorcycle.
Delay in recording confessional statement will not be treated fatal on the case of prosecution(Murder Trial)
V) During investigation, the Investigating Officer concluded that fireplace-arm injury which was fatal to your deceased was caused from the petitioner but in support of opinion in the Investigating Officer no iota of evidence is offered around the file and mere ipsi dixit of police isn't binding about the Court.
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not respond to inquiries seeking legal tips or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed towards the court in which the case has become or will be filed.
record on the department there is not any record accessible whatsoever regarding promotion on the petitioner(Promotion)
It allows individuals to research legal issues, understand their rights, and prepare for legal proceedings. This access is particularly important in Pakistan, where legal assist is often pricey and tough to receive.
Free case law sites in Pakistan are a must have resources for any person needing to understand Pakistani law. By making use of the tips and techniques outlined in this article, you may navigate these resources effectively and conduct thorough legal research.
The Court thought of the case to get maintainable under Article 184 (3) since the Hazard and encroachment alleged were like to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.
nine. Needless to mention that any observations made in the above mentioned order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.
When the petitioner is solely present at the place of occurrence without causing any injury towards the deceased or PWs then in these types of circumstances, whether He's vicariously liable shall be decided through the discovered trial Court after recording of the evidence.
How much sway case law holds might vary by jurisdiction, and by the precise circumstances on the current case. To examine this concept, look at the following case legislation definition.
This article delves into the intricacies of your recent amendment, accompanied by relevant case regulation, to provide a comprehensive understanding of its implications and realistic applications.
When website the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC might dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a possibility to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only completed If your employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence as well as the petitioner company responded towards the allegations as a result they were very well aware about the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to be appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
115 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance in the respondents that pensionary benefits may very well be withheld on account of the allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section twenty in the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does give for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension may be withheld or reduced. These involve if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension may very well be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set through the government.